Pali bhasha me uttirnit abhilekho ka prachin bharatiya itihas dnan me ullekhaniya yetihasik drushti se ye abhilekh bahut hi mahatvapurna hai.

Purva vidarbha ha talavancha pradesh manun aajahi olakhalya jato.

The 19th century scholars on Kabir and the Kabirpanth used to prepare lists of works attributed to Kabir and during this period, several seemed to have been unable to push their acquaintance with Kabir any further than this. The earliest reference to Kabirpanth occurs in the ethnographic work of H.H.Wilson,1 written in the early nineteenth century. Considering Kabirpanth as a Hindu religious sect, Wilson commented on his social composition, organizational form, myths and rituals. He has based his account on some devotional texts, individual interviews, and a few religious scriptures of the panth. Some of the secondary sources directly relate to the history of Kabirpanth. The first historian of Hindi literature, Garcin de Tassy, between 1837 and 1847 composed his famous work,2 in which he devotes fourteen pages to Kabir alone.

Revolutionary social reformer Mahatma Phule had said that our society cannot stand without learning. He had said that in the name of theism, perversion is born, so injustice has been done to Dalits in a systematic manner, so we should stand by Dalits. It seems to be cleared that Hindu culture is not a rite of passage.In India, castes are religious. The country will not get the right name unless the chain of these castes is broken. He was adamant that love of caste was a threat to democracy. Dr. Ambedkar set out to destroy the so-called ideals of Brahma, Soul, Delusion, Origin and existence of the universe.He said that even though I was born a Hindu in Hinduism, I would not die as a Hindu. Dr Ambedkar, who made many movements for the progress of the downtrodden class and sacrificed hislife,for this, he gave anear spells to the Dalits that ‘the slave should revolt against slavery to makeslave aware of slavery’.He said that our life should be based on self-esteem, self-reliance and self-confidence. Dr. Ambedkar took care

Northeast India is a politically vital and strategically vulnerable region of India. Surrounded by five countries, it is connected with the rest of India through a narrow, thirty-kilometre corridor. North-East India, then called Assam, is divided into Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland and Tripura. Diversities in terms of Mongoloid ethnic origins, linguistic variation and religious pluralism characterise the region. This ethnic-linguistic-ecological historical heritage characterizes the pervasiveness of the ethnic populations and Tibeto-Burman languages in northeast. North-East mountain ranges and river valleys indeed divide up South- East Asia from South Asia. This predominant tribal region, replete with protracted records of isolation, difficult terrain, and lack of intense inter-ethnic contacts, had witnessed formation of three types of society and polity such as 'tribe', 'chiefdom' and 'state' (Das 1989). The clans and age set systems within them had often functioned hierarchically involving unequal statuses (Das 1993). Full-fledged state-formation took place in the 4th century A.D. Hinduism remained confined to some pockets, including the royal families, among the Kachari, Ahom, Jaintia, Koch, Tripuri, and Meitei. Penetration of Sarania dharma of Shankar Dev was felt in some plains tribal societies, who became followers of Sarania even while simultaneously pursuing tribal religions often replete with animal sacrifices' (Das 2003).